Archives: Reg Murphy Pubs

Inequality is not a bad thing in Capitalist economics

A few weeks ago, I wrote about the vast demographic and economic divide between Brunswick and St. Simons Island, and I promised a follow-up to address how we should respond to the data. The answer to this question is complex and may differ depending on whom you ask — an Islander, a Brunswickian, a businessperson, a policymaker, a nonprofit leader, or a member of the clergy. Each would have a different perspective, and many, no doubt, are greater authorities on the subject than I.

As an economist, I will attempt to shed some light on how inequality affects us in terms of society’s economic growth and individuals’ economic wellbeing. I will approach the topic from the point of view of a capitalist, though, of course, a communist or socialist would have much to add to the discussion.

I should warn you, though, that even among capitalist economists, there is more than one school of thought here, and debate on this topic has spanned decades.

First, it is worth mentioning that almost all economists agree there is no finite limit to society’s wealth, and that in general, the poor are not poor because the rich are rich. We should not view inequality as a consequence of some individuals taking wealth or income away from others. Our question, then, is not one of whom to blame for the existence of inequality but of whether or not it should concern us and, if so, what we should do about it.

According to traditional capitalist theory, inequality is neither to be deemed good nor bad. It simply is a description of the way things are, and in some sense, it is proof that capitalism is working.

The fact that some are able to accumulate great wealth is evidence that the American dream is attainable and serves as incentive for less wealthy individuals to work hard, to create, and to innovate to grow their own wealth and, as a byproduct, to spur overall economic growth.

Wealthy Americans save more of their incomes than others, and middle or lower income Americans are more likely to devote their income to consumer spending. Thus, increasing inequality, typically due to greater wealth accumulating to the upper class, could negatively affect growth by decreasing consumer spending.

However, macroeconomic theory tells us economic growth depends heavily on savings, which are used to finance investment in human and physical capital. Thus, when more wealth lies with the rich, their investment should boost growth, benefiting even the less wealthy through lower prices and more jobs.

Therefore, many economists believe inequality is not something to be fixed, per se, but is a natural consequence of healthy capitalism.

Others believe inequality is a grave threat to our capitalist economy. This idea stems from the notion that sustained poverty hinders economic growth and from the existence of the phenomenon known as the poverty trap.

I will plan to write more on this second point of view in my next column.

  • Melissa Trussell
  • Reg Murphy Center

We are fortunate to have Jekyll, Sea islands

One of the expectations of economists working in academia is publication. My career is full of written work that, in all truth, no one has ever read except for my mother. She kept all my research in the holiest of places — the top shelf of her closet.

In doing research, one always hopes to find an original question — one touched by no one else. Here we can clearly search for an original answer. Yet, in many cases, we simply end up repeating the work of other academics, except we use a different methodology. Different methods often produce different conclusions, making our work relevant. Yet, you can avoid accountability in this way by saying that two pieces of research cannot really be compared, and therefore judged, because they are not really the same due to differences in methods.

It is a wonderful thing when comparisons can be made and the issue of different methods is not at play. Such is the case of two economic impact studies done by the Selig Center for Economic Growth of the University of Georgia of Jekyll Island and Sea Island. Both are based on 2016 data and the underlying methodology is identical. So while Jekyll Island and Sea Island appear very different, the analysis performed by the Selig Center treats them as if they are identical, thereby, allowing for comparison.

What are some things that should be considered in doing an economic analysis? First, they are members of the same industry — hospitality and tourism.

Second, they may be classified in the same industry but they are very different. Sea Island is the best private resort — in every facet — in the world. Given my unbiased assessment, its operations are private, profit-seeking. It is even family owned. From golf tournaments, to gatherings of world leaders, it is exclusive, expensive and simply wonderful.

Jekyll Island is on the other end of the ownership spectrum. Jekyll Island is a self-governing state park largely occupied by outside vendors (the Westin, for example). Just pay $6 and you enter for the day. In addition, at any time, only 35 percent of the land area can be developed. Like Sea Island, Jekyll is uniquely special. From the history connected to the island itself, the initial conversations leading to the creation of the Federal Reserve, to the best graduation venue (the Convention Center) in the world (CCGA has graduation there), Jekyll Island remains a state park.

Economic impact studies are very interesting. They are largely based on the idea that one person’s spending is another person’s income. Both Sea Island and Jekyll Island have part-time and full-time employees whose income come from the spending of all sorts of visitors. Yet, after work, employees spend their income. So a second person and business is impacted. This is to say, to know economic impact we need to understand what is called a multiplier process.

What do the Selig studies tell us about their respective economic impacts on Glynn County? They are virtually identical. In gross revenue, Jekyll has the advantage with $700 million in sales compared to Sea Island’s $670 million. Sea Island’s impact in jobs totals 6,254 (direct, indirect, and induced) with $200 million in labor income. Jekyll Island’s employment numbers 7,170 with $249 million in labor income. Sea Island contributes $370 million to local GDP, while the activity on Jekyll Island contributes $416 million to GDP. Both contribute around $25 million in tax revenue.

Even more impressive is when you combine the two economic equals. They account for 22 percent of gross sales and for 28.5 percent of all jobs in Glynn County. This analysis is not to dismiss the importance of others in the hospitality and tourism industry. Yet, these are two economic powerhouses.

Economic impact is only one of the many margins Sea Island and Jekyll Island that can be used for comparison. Also consider their awards and recognitions, histories, community advancement and engagements, and on and on. For this space, let us celebrate their combined economic presence. We are very fortunate that both Sea Island and Jekyll Island are in our community and the opportunities they provide our citizens.

  • Reg Murphy Center
  • Skip Mounts

Local labor force moves with the business cycle

Of all the markets in the economy, the labor market is without question the most complex. The national labor market consists of tens of millions of buyers of labor — private firms, nonprofit organizations, governments and government agencies — and more than 160 million sellers of labor — workers who are scattered all over the country.

The buyers of labor have ever changing demands for zillions of specific skills, while the sellers each have specific skills that are also fluid: skills can be enhanced and acquired, as well as lost.

Obstacles to labor market transactions abound. It takes time and money for employers and workers to find each other, and bad matches are costly to both parties.

Local labor markets, to the extent there are such things, are only slightly less complex. I say to the extent there are such things because employers and workers rarely limit their searches to workers and employers of a local area.

Labor markets are always in flux. Even more so over the business cycle.

It’s not just the levels of employment and unemployment that fluctuate with the business cycle. The size of the labor force itself fluctuates with the business cycle.

The labor force — which consists of employed workers plus workers classified as unemployed (not working but looking of work) — rises in boom times and shrinks in recessions. Our local labor force is a perfect example.

The years 2000 to 2005 were boom years in Glynn County. During those years, the county’s population increased by 7.4 percent. The county’s labor force increased by even more: 12.4 percent.

The recession hit us sometime around mid-2006. The local labor force continued to grow, but at a slower rate. Between 2005 and 2008, while the county’s population grew by 7.5 percent, the county’s labor force grew by 5.1 percent, reaching a peak of 41,730 in July 2008.

The recession then went from bad to worse. It lingered in Glynn through 2014. And the county’s labor force shrunk.

From 2008 to 2014, the population of Glynn grew by 5.3 percent, from 78,013 to 82,175. From July 2008 to December 2014, Glynn’s labor force fell from 41,780 to 36,427, a decrease of 12.7 percent.

Consider the decrease from another angle. In 2005, 54 percent of Glynn’s population was in the labor force. By 2015, 45 percent of the county’s population was in the labor force. That’s not the aging of the local population at work. That’s the business cycle at work.

Where did all those workers go during our recession?

Workers, like entrepreneurs, seize opportunities. Most workers in the labor force are full-time workers who remain in the labor force looking for work should they lose their jobs. But a sizable portion of workers — roughly 30 percent according to recent Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates — do not work full-time, year-round.

These workers tend to be more responsive to shifting labor market conditions. During recessions when jobs are scarce, many of these workers are quicker to drop out of the labor force should they lose their jobs. When economic conditions and job opportunities improve, back into the labor force they go.

The good news for Glynn is, that’s just what we’re seeing now. The county’s labor force now stands at 39,506 up 8.5 percent from that December 2014 level of 36,427. As our local economy continues to grow, we’ll see that trend continue.

  • Don Mathews
  • Reg Murphy Center

Read More about What difference four short miles makes

Four miles can make a big difference. According to an article posted to Livestrong.com last September, an average adult can lose about a pound a week if he or she walks four miles a day (about 10,000 steps) without increasing caloric intake.

Marathoners will tell you that pacing in the first four miles is crucial to how well one will finish the race. Four miles below earth’s surface lies molten rock hot enough to provide electricity to Iceland, and four miles above sea level stands the peak of Denali, North America’s highest summit. (Denali was known as Mount McKinley until it was officially renamed by President Obama in 2015.)

Just as in fitness and geography, four miles can make a big difference in economies and in individual or household welfare. The most striking example of this difference I have ever observed up close is here in Glynn County. You have probably already guessed what four miles I am referring to — the four miles of causeway between St. Simons Island and downtown Brunswick.

A casual glance at data from the U.S. Census Bureau begins to tell a story of two very different communities on either side of the causeway. St. Simons (not including Sea Island) has a population around 16,000, 93 percent white, while a little more than 22,000 individuals call Brunswick home, 62 percent of them racial minorities. The median age on the Island is in the mid-50s and in Brunswick is under 40. Ninety-six percent of Island residents have a high school diploma, but only 80 percent of Brunswickians can boast the same.

The story of our four-mile divide gets stronger when we begin to look into economic welfare.

In a list of Georgia zip codes ordered from highest average income to lowest, Sea Island ranks first, Saint Simons 39th (sixth among zip codes outside metro Atlanta), and Brunswick is 940th (out of 953).

The median household income in St. Simons is nearly $76,000, while in Brunswick, it is under $28,000. More than one-third of Brunswick’s residents live below the poverty line, and over 95 percent of Islanders live above it.

But, wait! There’s more!

Since so many of our residents are retirees, measures of current income really only tell half the story of the economic divide between Brunswick and St. Simons.

A more complete picture — and even greater divide — emerges when we look at residents’ accumulated wealth, or net worth. The median net worth of an individual in Brunswick is less than $15,000. The median net worth for census tracts on the southern end of St. Simons ranges from slightly more than $118,000 to just over $200,000. And for the area north of Sea Island Road and east of Federica Road, the median net worth is above $500,000.

Given these facts, the stark differences between end points of the F.J. Torras Causeway are undeniable. How we respond to the facts is a subject of great debate among economists and policymakers and is a discussion that will require more space than I have remaining for this week’s column. (Look for more on this in coming weeks.)

But, isn’t it amazing what a difference four miles can make?

  • Melissa Trussell
  • Reg Murphy Center

When ‘feeling bougie’ is a good thing

Ever heard the term “bougie?” (It’s pronounced with a soft g, as opposed to ‘boogie’, which is pronounced with a hard g.)

I heard “bougie” for the first time this past summer from several of my college students. The students found it humorous that I had never heard the term, but they cut me some slack because I’m old.

“Bougie,” of course, derives from “bourgeois.” My students didn’t realize that because most had never heard the term “bourgeois,” and the few who had really didn’t know what it means. I cut them some slack because they’re young.

Karl Marx used bourgeois, with much venom, as a synonym for the capitalist class and the values and habits of that class. Most other writers define bourgeois more broadly as the middle and upper classes and their values and habits.

“Bougie” is a tongue-in-cheek term with several meanings. One student said that if you’re in the mood for some serious shopping, you’re “feeling bougie.” Another student explained that to be “bougie” is to purchase upscale consumer items to create the impression that you have money and upscale consumer tastes, even if you don’t.

Either way, the fact that 21st century American young adults have come up with the term “bougie” and use it with such playful irony would have Karl Marx wailing and gnashing his teeth in his grave. And not just Marx. From well before Marx to the present day, scores of intellectuals, from the right as well as from the left, have reviled bourgeois society for being shallow, materialistic, small-minded and devoid of real virtue.

And not just intellectuals. Artists, frequently those whom bourgeois society has made rich, as well as aristocrats and cultural defenders of aristocracy have made denigrating bourgeois society a reason for living.

One of the slams against bourgeois society is that its moral and spiritual shallowness render it incapable of inspiring anything great or transcendent, or an appreciation of the great or transcendent, especially in literature, music and art.

Hmmm. Consider the most bourgeois society on the planet, that of our own country. So: no great or transcendent literature, music, or art has ever been produced in America? Really? One ought to look a bit before making such a claim.

But bourgeois society’s contribution to literature, music and art goes far beyond what it has produced. Thanks to bourgeois capitalism, people of all walks of life have sufficient income and leisure to enjoy the world’s greatest literature, music and art.

Bourgeois society has made the greatest literature available dirt cheap. Cervantes’ Don Quixote can be had for $8, Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn for $6.

Each of Shakespeare’s plays are available for $5, while volumes of his complete works start at $22.

The greatest music is available at comparable prices. Even better, one can listen to the greatest music for free at that wonderful bourgeois audio-video circus, youtube.com.

What about great art? One can view masterpieces ‘second hand’ in books or on-line. Good art, though, is readily available for ‘first hand’ viewing and even purchase.

Bourgeois society has a huge appetite for art. No need to look far for proof. St. Simons Island is loaded with art stores. And as the rejuvenation of downtown Brunswick kicks into gear, art shops and studios are leading the way.

No doubt plenty of you will be giving great books, great music, and local art as Christmas gifts. The people who receive those gifts will be enriched far beyond the price of the gift. Now, if you ask me, that’s what ‘feeling bougie’ ought to mean.

  • Don Mathews
  • Reg Murphy Center

Data shows tax simplification could work

Economics is a data driven social science. It is a social science because economists are trying to understand why people do what they do. It is data driven because economists hardly ever agree on anything.

Beginning with the first course in economics as undergraduates and continuing into graduate school, economists learn about many alternative types of theories. Over time, after being exposed to these alternatives, economists tend to become comfortable with those theories they think “work.” By “work,” we mean that these theories seem to do the best in explaining why people do what they do. For example, I tend to fall into the free market category. In my understanding, theories based on free market principles do a good job explaining human behavior.

The next thing we do is to see if our preferred theories are supported by real world data. This is why economics is beautiful. The theories that we love and use must be consistent with data collected from real world observation. Remember, the goal — we want to know why people do what they actually do. Theories that are not supported by the data may be a great brain exercise, but they are useless in helping us understand reality.

Here is a piece of data. Between 1968 and 2015, in the aggregate, the percent of national income going to income tax collections is 17.35 percent. A horizontal line set at 17.35 percent nicely represents a graph of the actual individual annual percentages. Yet, over this same period, the top tax rate has ranged from a high of 77 percent to a low of 28 percent while ending at the current 39.6 percent. Viewed another way, no matter how hard the federal government tries to capture our income through tax collections, they ultimately only get 17.35 percent. At a top rate of 77 percent, we work very hard to find ways to not pay taxes. As the rate falls we don’t work so hard at tax avoidance.

So, if Congress is currently working on tax reform, why not go all the way to work on tax simplification and let it be data driven. If, in the end, all we are going to give the government averages 17.35 percent, why not just have one tax rate of — go figure — 17.35 percent. Do away with all deductions and the like state and local taxes, mortgage interest, childcare — all of them.

Have one standard deduction based on family size, period. In this world, every one will use a post card and the IRS bureaucracy could be reduced. This is what the data tell us. Should we listen? Or better yet, should our political leaders listen?

  • Reg Murphy Center
  • Skip Mounts

When discrimination is a good thing

Discrimination is a dirty word. Rarely a day passes in which we are not confronted with news of alleged discrimination in employment, law enforcement, or some other setting. And each time, the news arouses intense emotion from the accuser, from the accused and from those who sympathize with either party. Regardless of which side of a particular case you identify with, I bet we can all agree that if — when — discrimination happens, it is bad.

Economic theory generally agrees with our moral compass. Discrimination based on characteristics such as race, gender, or religion causes inefficiencies in markets and overall economic losses to society. This is an important result, and maybe one day I will write more on this.

This week, though, another kind of discrimination is on my mind — a good kind of discrimination. Discrimination in its literal sense is not always bad. For example, for those of us who will find ourselves in retail stores or shopping online this Friday, discrimination could be very good. Let me explain.

Price discrimination is the term used to describe a situation in which a firm charges different prices to two or more groups of consumers who purchase an identical product or service. The idea is that if the firm is able to figure out which customers would not buy their product at higher prices, they offer them a deal to entice them to buy, but they maintain higher prices for customers who are willing to pay more. The result is that consumers — especially those with lower incomes — have greater opportunity to purchase the good or service, and firms are able to sell more and generate higher profits. Both consumers and firms benefit from good discrimination.

As we discussed this idea in class last week, a student pointed out that Black Friday sales are a good example of this type of discrimination. Those who are willing to fight crowds and stand in long lines pay lower prices for the same products others will buy for higher prices closer to Christmas.

Parents of young children know all about this. Last holiday season, the hottest toy on the market was the Hatchimal, one of several “species” of egs that hatches into a trainable stuffed animal when appropriately nurtured by its human. Wal-Mart’s 2016 Black Friday add promised Hatchimals for $48.88, as much as a 20 percent discount off the regular price of the toys. Of course, supplies were limited, and the toys flew off shelves, leaving many to buy the toys later at full price, or worse — from resellers for as much as double the regular retail price.

On its surface, this example may not make price discrimination seem all that good. After all, Black Friday discounts just lead to empty shelves and frustrated customers. But, the good in price discrimination is what keeps us coming back every year after the Thanksgiving turkey has been put away. The good is in the opportunity for the deal — an opportunity over 154 million Americans took advantage of in 2016. Even if most parents left last year frustrated by empty shelves, many were willing and able to purchase Hatchimals later at higher prices. And some parents who may never have been able to pay the resellers’ prices had the opportunity to make their children happy because of Black Friday price discrimination.

  • Melissa Trussell
  • Reg Murphy Center

We’ve got some catching up to do

Next month marks the 10-year anniversary of the onset of the Great Recession of 2007-2009. Not exactly an anniversary to celebrate. The Great Recession hit the U.S. hard and Georgia harder — and it creamed Glynn.

So, where is our local economy today compared to where it was 10 years ago, just before the recession hit? And how has our local economy fared over the last 10 years compared to Georgia and the U.S.?

A telling measure of an economy is real gross domestic product — real GDP for short. Real GDP is the inflation-adjusted market value of an economy’s production, as well as income generated from production. Tracking how real GDP changes over time tells us a lot about the health of an economy.

In the U.S., real GDP fell by 3.2 percent from 2007 through 2009. It has grown every year since 2009, and is now 14.4 percent greater than it was 10 years ago, just before the recession hit.

In Georgia, real GDP fell by 6.7 percent from 2007 through 2009. It has grown every year since 2009, and is now 6.6 percent greater than it was 10 years ago.

In Glynn, real GDP didn’t just fall from 2007 through 2009. It fell from 2007 through 2014, and by a whopping 15.8 percent. It began growing again in 2015, but is still 7.9 percent less than it was 10 years ago.

An even more telling measure of an economy is real per capita GDP. Real per capita GDP — or real GDP per person — is real GDP divided by the economy’s population. Real per capita GDP says much about the standard of living in a region.

In the U.S., real per capita GDP was $49,126 in 2007. In 2009, it was $46,680, a decrease of 5 percent from 2007. U.S. real per capita GDP is now $50,577, 3 percent greater than its 2007 level.

In Georgia, real per capita GDP was $46,734 in 2007. By 2010, it had fallen by 9.4 percent to $42,029. It is now $44,723, still 3.6 percent below its 2007 level.

In Glynn, real per capita GDP was $40,255 in 2007. It then fell in each of the next seven years to $31,478 in 2014, a decrease of 21.8 percent from its 2007 level. Glynn real per capita GDP has increased since 2015 and is now $33,580, still 16.6 percent below its level ten years ago.

Note the gap between real per capita GDP in Glynn and real per capita GDP in the U.S. The gap was big in 2007: real per capita GDP in Glynn was 18 percent less than real per capita GDP in the U.S. The gap has since become a chasm. Real per capita GDP in Glynn is now 33.6 percent less than real per capita GDP in the nation.

That is not just a gap between a couple of arcane economic numbers. The gap between those numbers reflects a gap in living standards and a gap in the things that drive living standards.

The news is certainly not all bad. Our local economy is growing again, and at a decent clip. Not only are real GDP and real per capita GDP growing again, we’re also seeing significant improvement in the labor market.

But goodness, we’ve got some catching up to do.

  • Don Mathews
  • Reg Murphy Center

Entrepreneurship is alive and well in Brunswick

On the first Wednesday of every month at 9 a.m. a group of people gather at Tipsy McSway’s in downtown Brunswick to listen to two entrepreneurs talk about their businesses or nonprofits. We hear it all — beginnings, histories, successes, problems and challenges. Such is the nature of 1 Million Cups, Brunswick. These meetings have been going on for 18 months so it is time to tell the citizens of the Golden Isles what we have learned about our Brunswick entrepreneurs.

In general, entrepreneurs are an interesting lot. Regardless of where one goes, you tend to find them in unexpected places. They value their individuality. And they all have interesting stories that have led them to do what they do. In many cases their calling is so strong they have to do what they do.

Almost 42 percent of our entrepreneurs and presenters and their enterprises can be found in downtown Brunswick. It seems like there is a general impression in our community that not much is going on in downtown. While there is often news of renewed hope of a hotel and conference center development project, entrepreneurs are filling the void. Entrepreneurs will often go where others will not. Opportunity has many different faces and between Norwich and Newcastle streets may offer such an unexpected place.

Nearly 53 percent of our 1 Million Cups entrepreneurs are women. This is very unusual relative to other communities that support a 1 Million Cups forum. Entrepreneurs are, more often than not, go-it-alone, risk-taking pathfinders. Here, success is its own reward where judgment is only found in the ability to please customers. Opinions based on arbitrary characteristics such as gender do not find a home in the world of entrepreneurs.

To affirm these points about our Brunswick entrepreneurs, new freedoms and social liberalizations are being introduced in Saudi Arabia through the influence of reformer Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. One of the first signs of the impact of these small initial changes is the appearance of entrepreneurs and their food trucks in the capital city of Riyadh. One of the most popular, judging by the line of men wanting to buy coffee, is run by a woman and her daughter.

Finally, Brunswick entrepreneurs have some amazing stories. Entrepreneurship is more than just starting a business. It involves the beginning creativity necessary to identify unmet needs of others or problems that need to be solved. In the case of our Brunswick entrepreneurs opportunity and creativity have been found in the napkins of a grandmother, in the hearts of rescue dogs, in the wellbeing of veterans, in the desire to give kids their own places to read at home, to just know that there is opportunity in the vacant buildings in downtown Brunswick and on and on. All are special and unique. Entrepreneurial storytelling is alive and well in Brunswick.

Data from studies of the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City show that since 1980, businesses aged 0 to 5 years show positive net job creation — more jobs are created than destroyed. Businesses 6 to 10 years of age show zero net job creation over the same period while businesses older than 11 years show negative job growth. So, economic prosperity and job creation is found in new firms. The ecosystem that generates new businesses is the land of the entrepreneur. From the experiences presented at 1 Million Cups, Brunswick, our ecosystem is alive, well and very special.

  • Reg Murphy Center
  • Skip Mounts

Economic development requires involving the community

Last week, my colleague Dr. Don Mathews wrote about ways in which Hurricane Irma gave us a glimpse of what life is like for millions of folks living in developing countries without electricity or running water. I have spent a good bit of time living and working in developing countries, and I echo Don’s sentiment — thank goodness for electricity and plumbing here at home.

While I am grateful for the ways in which Southeast Georgia differs from countries in the developing world, I have become increasingly aware of the ways in which we are similar. A high percentage of our population live in poverty (Glynn County — 19 percent, Indonesia — 11 percent), though the gap between our richest and poorest households is astounding. We have low labor force participation (Camden County — 49 percent, Nigeria — 56 percent). And residents of our region who are over age 25 are unlikely to have earned a college degree (Charlton County — 11 percent, Ecuador — 14 percent).

With such similarities to low-income countries, there are things we can learn about ourselves by looking to the literature on economics and policy in developing countries. For starters, one of the greatest lessons in economic development is the need for all actors with a stake in the success of the community to work together toward a shared vision. For long-term, sustainable development to occur, everyone — government entities, business owners, nonprofit leaders and, perhaps most importantly, local residents — must be involved throughout the development process.

There is a classic example of development done wrong: the well-meaning charitable giver who decides to collect shoes from his home country to give away to barefoot children in a village in a developing country. Consequentially, the children are shoed, but the local cobbler goes out of business, and the entire village becomes dependent on outside aid to provide footwear.

The shoe-giver attempts to address an immediate symptom with an unsustainable solution, and the result is to move the village backward, rather than forward in economic development. What made this solution unsustainable? It did not involve all local stakeholders in the shoe market. It was a development project done for the community rather than with the community. Perhaps a better approach would have been to involve the community in finding and addressing the root of the barefootedness. Maybe the real problem is not a lack of shoes, but a lack of job opportunities, leaving parents unable to afford shoes for their children. And the “solution” of providing free shoes adds the cobbler to the list of unemployed.

So, what can we in Southeast Georgia learn from this example of an unsuccessful development attempt in a poor village far away?

Consider our development goals here at home, poverty relief; improved labor force participation; increased education; community revitalization. In working toward these goals, our efforts are best spent first getting to know our poor, our non-working, our young and others in our communities to understand what our needs really are before we start blindly throwing shoes. And as we get to know our neighbors and understand our collective strengths and weaknesses, we will be in a position to work together to capitalize on our strengths to address our weaknesses through sustainable economic and community development.

  • Melissa Trussell
  • Reg Murphy Center