As events ramped up this week around the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, I found myself reflecting on what the Reverend’s legacy means to me as an educator. Dr. King’s most well-known speeches centered on the topics of civil rights, racial equality, and nonviolent protest. However, his advocacy for freedom of speech, expression, and the pursuit of knowledge were equally moving and resonate with me as I enter the classroom for another semester.
In February of 1947, at the age of 18, King wrote an article in the Morehouse College paper, The Maroon Tiger, entitled “The Purpose of Education.” You may be thinking he wrote this article as a first-year freshman at Morehouse – what could he possibly have understood about the purpose of education at that point? In fact, at just 15 years of age King skipped two grades and was accepted to Morehouse College graduating at age 19 in 1948. The young scholar’s remarks on education continue to be relevant in 21st century America from the K-12 classroom to the College lecture hall.
In his article, King issues a warning to educators: “We must remember that intelligence is not enough. Intelligence plus character—that is the goal of true education.” The message is salient today as we think about the role of education in the lives of students. Indeed, the national discussion around the value of higher education questions whether the investment in college is worth the return.
Is our aim academic achievement alone? In “The Purpose of Education,” King argued for an education that fosters critical thinking and moral integrity. He warned against the dangers of an education that stops at efficiency, producing individuals with intellect but no moral compass.
King argued for an education that goes beyond knowledge acquisition. He envisioned an educational system that teaches students to discern truth from falsehood, to think intensively and critically. He explained that, “a great majority of the so-called educated people do not think logically and scientifically. Even the press, the classroom, the platform, and the pulpit in many instances do not give us objective and unbiased truths. To save man from the morass of propaganda, in my opinion, is one of the chief aims of education. Education must enable one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false, the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction.”
As educators we are teaching in an era of misinformation and now even AI-generated propaganda. While we want our students to have the practical skills they will need to be successful in their careers, we are also responsible for helping them to become expert consumers of information. They must learn to sift through the huge amounts of information they have access to and find the data and reporting that is most reliable. In doing so, they become adept at seeing the world not in a single way, but in a multidimensional way. They learn to weigh information rather than take it all at face value.
At College of Coastal Georgia, these issues are at the heart of our teaching. We want students to be problem-solvers. We want them to become curious critical thinkers. We do this by asking students to think beyond a single set of “answers” and instead to creatively explore issues in business, public administration, environmental science, economics, and so forth, so they can find solutions and spur innovation. This was part of the vision King had in mind.
King ends his article with a further warning: “If we are not careful, our colleges will produce a group of close-minded, unscientific, illogical propagandists, consumed with immoral acts. Be careful, “brethren!” Be careful, teachers!” As we celebrate King’s birthday and reflect on his contributions, it is clear that his views on education are not just historical artifacts but living principles that continue to guide us. What a gift he leaves behind.
Dr. Heather Farley is Chair of the Department of Business and Public Administration and Associate Professor of Public Management at the College of Coastal Georgia. She is an associate of the College’s Reg Murphy Center for Economic and Policy Studies and an environmental policy scholar. The opinions found in this article do not represent those of the College of Coastal Georgia.
Reg Murphy Center